

- DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE HOW TO
- DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE FULL
- DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE SOFTWARE
- DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE CODE
Apparently, there are options for importing tags and keywords from Lightroom - those are the tutorials I did NOT find time for yet - but even so, the interface is obviously not intended for this. This is a drawback for me particularly since I often mess up the exif time stamps (yes, I know, it's not hard, but I mess it up anyway!) Also, I had a lot of tags and keywords. I have to police myself really hard to keep me from going overboard with this - there are SO many options!Ĭapture One is NOT a tool for cataloguing, tagging or editing exif data. The advanced colour editor lets me focus on specific areas, fine tune brightness and saturation when I lift shadows a bit, and for instance get rid of weirdly tinted shadowed areas, tone down distracting artifacts or details etc. They do have a "local adjustment" feature, but with real layers and great masking options I have SO much more creative control now.ģ) Colour editing is absolutely stunning. I have never had Photoshop, so when I used Lightroom I did any layered work in GIMP, but mostly did my detailed editing with the Topaz plugins. But the default settings work very well.Ģ) Being able to edit in masked layers is simply a revolution to me. In my case particularly the DA* 300mm, my favourite lens. Like some of the comments above point out, Capture One does not prioritize Pentax, so a lot of the specific lens presets are missing. Switching during the holidays meant that for once I actually watched and read some tutorials rather than just diving blindly into the editing process, but I have to say, I am VERY happy with the switch!ġ) The default preview of my raw files is simply better: Better colours, better contrast. I picked my summer holidays for switching, and after carefully reading and considering the advice in the thread above and watching a few youtube videos on top, I went for Capture One.

By using this existing thread, previous contributors get notifications, so here we go: I know this thread is a bit old, and reviving ancient threads is generally a bad idea - but I REALLY did benefit from all the advise in this thread, and I would like to share some feedback. from that perspective I can see why they're cross paying that much for LR (and probably also not exploiting LR to its fullest!).
DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE HOW TO
I know a few professionals who hate Adobe, yet they only use LR, don't take advantage of Portfolio nor do they know how to use PS (or what it can do for them). I've said it before, the actual price of the Adobe plan for this, LR and PS is actually very reasonable and affordable in the grand scheme of things, you just have to make sure you're squeezing every last drop out of the product.

I also get this from my subscription Eddy Summers (Adobe Portfolio, free with the Adobe subscription) which in turn gets me more paid work and I have as of yet not needed to actually buy a website.
DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE SOFTWARE
If other free open software (or even reasonably priced cheaper ones) were to support synchronisation (and implemented well) as well as the same industry preset, LUT and plugin support entities. This is the area that LR (and to a degree PS) has all the power. LR has syncing which greatly improves the speed of workflow as well as being supported by various 3rd party industry preset, LUT and Plugins. model.Yeah, I mean I too am a fan of Linux and other free RAW editors (RawTherapee gets a fair amount of use for example), but for the professional (and I mean that, like as in event togs that do weddings and such), using such software is just unrealistic for big jobs. I can't imagine a situation where I'd return to the Microsoft/Adobe/etc.

DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE CODE
I even build my favorite RAW editor from source code so it's specifically tailored and optimized for my particular hardware.
DXO PHOTOLAB VS CAPTURE ONE FULL
I get a full office suite, operating system, two RAW editors, lens correction database, a pixel-level editor, panorama stitching application, video editor, and photo downloading utility for $0/month.
